MILITANT ATHEISM EXPOSED HOME


Introduction

Agenda
Successes
Secrets
Inaccuracies
Distortions
Mistakes
Arrogance
Immorality
Crimes
Fear Mongering
Ex- Atheists
R. Dawkins
B. Russell
D. Hume 
Atheists and Divorce
The Greatest Minds and God
Nobelists and God
Is God Cruel?
Is Christianity Evil?
Bible Contradictions?
Creationism
About God and Jesus Christ
Great Theistic Works
God's Existence Sites
C. Hitchens
S. Harris
P. Pullman
Open Letter to Atheist/Agnostic-Jews
Open Letter to Christians Who Embraced Atheism
Free Literature
The Author
MANY MORE TOPICS ON HOME PAGE
HOME
 
 

RECOMMENDED READINGS

 

The Dawkins Delusion?  

 

Darwin on Trial

 

The Edge of Evolution

 

Darwin's Black  Box        

Intelligent Design      

The Fingerprint of God

 

The Creator and the Cosmos

Creation As Science

God and the New Atheism

The Cell's Design

Understanding Intelligent Design

Icons of Evolution

The Language of God

What's So Great About Christianity

What If God...?

 

 

ATHEISM AND MORALITY

      Atheists insist in their literature and web sites that they are moral people and that human beings do not need a god to be moral. This site proposes that though they and others can choose to be relatively decent people, they are far and distant from the quality of morality fulfilled by "true" Christians.


     The key word in the above question is, “moral.” What is morality? Various sources define it differently. This should not surprise us.  Without a God-given moral code, all humans have the right to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong, and if they, like the arch-atheist Nietzsche, want to propose that  “good is evil and evil is good,” who is to say otherwise?

     Are there decent people among atheists, therefore? Are there atheists who are kind and honest and respectful of others? Most probably.  Are they “always” kind, honest and respectful? Probably not. If they choose to cheat on their “self-chosen” ethics who will know? Who will they answer to, when they “deviate”? If they want to rationalize their unethical actions (and the mind is an expert at this, as Freud taught us) who will be there to present to them the opposite viewpoint?

     For "totally committed” Christians, deviating from God’s will is unacceptable. If and when a deviation takes place because of weakness, their conscience will create “agonizing” guilt, which is often followed by repentance and a return to the straight path. If an atheist commits adultery, for instance, how much guilt will he or she feel afterward? How many rationalizations can one come up with to commit adultery? Quite a few. If atheists choose to cheat on their income taxes, rationalizing that the government is stealing from them, will they feel guilt?

     Atheists can choose to be decent people and may succeed in doing so to a significant extent, but they have human nature fighting against that choice. Carnal, selfish human nature is at work in them as well as in religious people. Carnal human nature will tempt them as well as it tempts sincere Christians. True Christians  have to create titanic mental distortions to escape their conscience's accusations -- atheists don’t. Atheists may actually choose to continue in their actions and not necessarily feel guilty, because they decide what is right or wrong and they can rationalize their actions ad nauseam and their minds may go perfectly along.

     Thus, atheists can be “relatively" moral,  but only God knows if and when they choose to deviate from their “flexible” morality. Do they deviate? I have no doubt that they do. And when they do, no one will be there to castigate them, and thus it will be easier for them to deviate next time around.

     True Christians have a Source to turn to, when temptations becomes too strong: God’s Spirit. They will pray, and they will receive “super-human” strength—if they are sincerely converted that is. Tele Evangelists, and evil priests who have blackened the name of Christ are not to be included in this group. Superficial, nominal Christians don’t belong in it either. Hypocrites are an embarrassment to humanity as well as the God Almighty.

     This then is the fundamental difference between converted Christians and atheists. The first have a conscience that is continually instructed, strengthened and nurtured by the Scriptures, and prayer; atheists do not. The first has a great Source of power to turn to, to fight and defeat deceitful, selfish, rationalization-prone human nature; atheists do not. -- And this makes a world of a difference.

     The type of morality embraced by “genuine” Christians is not just a morality of kindness and decency. It demands virtues that atheists do not have to be subject to, and that most do not care about. Atheists don’t have to love and forgive they who abuse them. They are not required to pray and wish the best for those who mistreat them. They are not expected to turn the other cheek, and to endure persecutions with a forgiving spirit.  Atheists may choose to stay faithful to their mate, but they are not required to never entertain adulterous thoughts as Christ commanded. They can choose to indulge in lusting after pornographic material or look lustfully at somebody else’s wife -- but the true followers of jesus Christ cannot. They can hate, but Christians are told that that hatred is "never" allowed.

     The morality of true Christians is a morality that is by far more demanding and all- encompassing. It not only deals with actions but with "thoughts" and "attitudes." It is a “higher-level” morality that requires spiritual help to fulfill.

     Can Atheists, therefore, be moral? The answer is, "partially and inconsistently." Higher-level morality is not achievable by atheists or believers, unless there is a "total" commitment to it, and unless it is nurtured by God’s Word, prayer and the empowering of the Holy Spirit. Anything less than this will lead to temporary and inconsistent morality that will be undermined by perceived need, outside pressures and selfish human nature.

     Kind and decent atheists, therefore, have to be respected, if they choose to follow such a path. They are to be admired, if they are able to maintain decency on a relatively consistent level. Yet, they are following an "incomplete" path and they will need to come to the point where they will finally admit to being weak in their attempts at being truly moral beings and that they are in need of help from a Higher Power, if they are desirous to truly achieve and experience "higher-level morality" on a consistent basis. 

________________________

 Related Readings

 Fark Atheistic Morality | epologetics

 The Lie Of Moral Atheism

    Why Atheists Should Say, "Thank God for Christianity" - News Bloggers

A  Little Message for Atheistic Friends...

    10 Questions Atheists Can't Answer Well

    Ex-Atheist.com. Christian Apologetics, Logic and Debate!

 

                                                                             HOME

eXTReMe Tracker