GALILEO:
ATHEIST OR BELIEVER IN GOD?
Galileo opposed well established views of
his time and contradicted Catholic dogma. This has led some atheists to
wrongly assume that Galileo was anti-religion. Again the truth is the very
opposite. Galileo was a Bible, Christ and God loving scientist who remained
firm in his Christian beliefs until the very end.
“…Galileo was one of the most
original and creative geniuses of all time. The consequences of his work for
man’s understanding of the world, and hence for human thought processes, is
beyond all calculation.”[i]
This assessment of Galileo, captures the greatness and worth of this
brilliant Italian scientist called by many the Father of Modern Science. Yet
this towering figure did not always enjoy this kind of glowing assessment by
the powers of his day. In fact, toward the end of his life, Galileo incurred
at first the displeasure and finally the wrath of the Catholic hierarchy,
who in those days had control over people’s lives.
Copernicus was the source of Galileo’s difficulties. His
revolutionary idea that the earth rotated around the sun convinced Galileo
that the then accepted view that the earth was the centre of the universe
was incorrect. His scientific observations of the moon and the planets
further convinced Galileo that Copernicus was indeed correct.
In his
excitement for the newfound scientific truths, Galileo travelled to Rome to
attempt to convince the church authorities of his conclusions. In Rome he
was confronted by none other than Cardinal Bellarmine, the defender of
Catholic Dogma, who was not convinced by Galileo’s arguments. In fact
Bellarmine instead became concerned that the Galilean views were potentially
dangerous to Catholicism. Consequently, Galileo was warned to treat his
ideas as hypothesis and not as fact. Galileo went back to Florence
discouraged but not defeated.
Years later, Galileo was buoyed by the death of the
Pope, and the fact that his replacement was one of his long-time supporters,
who came to be known as Pope Urban VIII. Convinced that this Pope would be
much more willing to accept his views, Galileo asked and received an
audience with him with whom he had a transparent exchange about his theory.
The Pope also presented his views against the heliocentric views and did so
clearly and cogently. Galileo listened and stored the Pope’s arguments in
his mental bank. Later on, when he wrote his master work, Dialogue
Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Galileo inserted them “…into the
mouth of a thick-headed character…And the pope’s arguments would be
ridiculed.” Unfortunately for Galileo, “Urban, too, would remember the
arguments he made. Their rough handling later did not amuse him. In some
ways this is the key to the fate of Galileo.[ii]
Pope Urban thus decreed that the book and Galileo’s
ideas were to be declared “anathema,” and that Galileo was to be severely
consequenced for not heeding Bellarmine’s warnings. Though some feared for
Galileo’s life, or a possible life-long imprisonment in the dark dungeons of
Castel Sant’Angelo, mercy prevailed, and he was given house arrest for the
rest of his life. Before the sentencing, though, Galileo had to abjure his
views openly by signing a document composed and approved by the inquisitory
body, which read as follows:
“I desire to remove from the minds of Your eminences and of
all faithful Christians this strong suspicion of heresy. With sincere heart
and unfeigned faith, I abjure, curse and detest my errors. I swear that in
the future, I will never again say or assert, verbally or in writing ,
anything to encourage this suspicion….Should I know any heretic or person
suspected of heresy, I shall denounce him in the Sacred canons.”[iii]
Later on Galileo, being the stubborn man that he was,
found a way to send his work to the Protestant North and to have it
published for the benefit of more willing and objective ears. The rest is
history. His views were validated by countless others, and they finally
prevailed.
Galileo’s trial and condemnation became “…one of the
defining narratives of modern western civilization,”[iv]
for it “…presents in a microcosm the issues that define the most portentous
turning point of the second millennium, the transition from the Age of Faith
to the Age of Reason—from an era of religion and spirituality to an epoch of
science and materialism.”[v]
Galileo ended his life feeling abandoned by men. He felt
misunderstood by the leadership of a church he loved until his death. No
doubt resentment at times filled his mind toward some humans in high places.
Nonetheless, his moments of bitterness toward men never clouded his faith in
the Scriptures and in God.
The Scriptures, to Galileo were divinely inspired and
inerrant, though humans can misinterpret their true meaning: “…the Holy
Scriptures cannot err and the decrees therein contained are absolutely true
and inviolable. I should have added that, though scripture cannot err its
expounders and interpreters are liable to err in many ways …when they base
themselves always on literal meaning of the words.”[vi]
At times the Bible uses figures of speech to simplify
concepts which “…had been inserted into the Bible for the sake of the
masses, Galileo insisted, to aid their understanding of matters pertaining
to their salvation. In the same way, biblical language had also simplified
certain physical effects in Nature, to conform to common experience.”[vii]
Galileo saw both the truths of Scriptures and the truths
of nature as having been derived from the same source: God; therefore, one
could not contradict the other. “Holy Scripture and nature, are both
emanations from the divine word: the former dictated by the Holy Spirit, the
latter the observant executrix of God’s commands.” Therefore “…no truth
discovered in Nature could contradict the deep truth of the Holy Writ.”
[viii] Furthermore,
Galileo held that the primary aim of Scriptures was not to reveal scientific
truths but “…to worship God and save souls.[ix]
The proper understanding of Scriptures required proper
illumination from God, thus Galileo turned to God in prayer for the ability
to understand the spiritual truths of the Bible:
“I trust the infinite goodness of God may direct toward the
purity of my mind a small amount of His grace that I may understand the
meaning of His words.”[x]
The human mind was according to Galileo one the greatest
of God’s achievements: “ When I consider what marvellous things men have
understood, what he has inquired into and contrived, I know only too clearly
that the human mind is a work of God, and one of the most excellent.”
Yet the potential of the human mind “. . . is
separated from the Divine knowledge by an infinite interval.”
[xi]
In His
mercy, God, on occasion, chooses to reveal a new insight to someone He
chooses, thus augmenting the knowledge revealed to humanity: “One must not
doubt the possibility that the Divine Goodness at times may choose to
inspire a ray of His immense knowledge in low and high intellects, when they
are adorned with sincere and holy zeal.”[xii]
Galileo saw himself as the recipient of some such great truths and expressed
gratitude to God for being the first to have the revelation: “I
render infinite thanks to God, for being so kind as to make me alone the
first observer of marvels kept hidden in obscurity for all previous
centuries.”[xiii]
He often
mused on what he saw as the stunning manifestations of God’s creative wisdom
as with birds and their ideal design for flight and fish and their perfect
design for swimming in water:
“God could have made birds with bones of massive gold, with veins full of
molten silver, with flesh heavier than lead and with tiny wings . . . He
could have made fish heavier than lead, and thus twelve times heavier than
water, but He has wished to make the former of bone, flesh, and feathers
that are light enough, and the latter as heavier than water, to teach us
that He rejoices in simplicity and facility.”[xiv]
His
observations and meditations on God’s wonders led him to the following
conclusion: “To me the works of nature and of God are miraculous.”[xv]
In his
later years Galileo had to confront the deterioration of his vigor and
vitality and the loss of health and his eyesight. But his worst and most
painful loss was the loss of his beloved daughter, Maria Celeste, who had
been this greatest comfort and solace throughout his most difficult and
trying years. In spite of all his tribulations, his faith in God remained
firm and unshakeable. Galileo believed strongly that all human suffering had
meaning and had to be welcomed with courage and resignation, knowing that
God allows all for the benefit of believers:
“Whatever the course of our lives, we should receive them as
the highest gift from the hand of God, in which equally reposed the power to
do nothing whatever for us. Indeed, we should accept misfortune not only in
thanks, but in infinite gratitude to Providence, which by such means
detaches us from an excessive love of Earthly things and elevates our minds
to the celestial and divine.”[xvi]
To the end God remained Galileo’s source of strength and
“…the source of all good.”[xvii]
No persecution; no loss; no illness took Galileo’s faith away from him until
the end. His unshakeable faith is eloquently summarized in the following
statement written at the end of his life journey:
“To the Lord; whom I worship and thank;
That governs the heavens with His eyelid
To Him I return tired, but full of living.”[xviii]
Michael Caputo
WORKS CITED
[i]
Magee Bryan, The Story of
Philosophy. New York: DK Publishing, Inc., 2001, 67.
[ii]
Reston, James, Galileo: A
life. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1994, 195.
[iv]
Rowland, Wade, Galileo’s
Mistake: The Archeology of a Myth. Toronto: Thomas Allen Publishers,
2001, 1.
[vi]
Sobel, Dava, Galileo’s
Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love. Toronto:
Viking Press, 1999, 63.
[ix]
Reston, op. cit., 137.
[x]
Chiari, A.
Galileo Galilei, Scritti Letterari.
Florence: Felice Le Monnier,
1970, 550.
[xi]
Poupard, Cardinal
Paul. Galileo Galilei.
Pittsburgh: Duquesne
University Press, 1983, 101.
[xii]
Chiari,
op. cit., 545.
[xv]
Brunetti, F.
Opere di Galileo Galilei. Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice
Torinese, 1964, 506.
[xvi]
Sobel, op. cit., 12.
|